There are of course many religions out there, that come out of not only a sense of need to express a godly connection, but also out of a culture based society. Many of those very same religions still adhere to belief in animals as Gods, or divination's and spells. Are they to be seen as valid worship of God? For those who believe this , of course they would say it is.
I believe that we are all part of a ever developing consciousness, and the peak of that development is that of the Christ. The Christ being Humanities Goal and the God of our Planetary System.
If we base religion or spirituality on nothing else, but the best representation of God in man, who would you choose as your representative? Maybe for some it would be a cow? Yet how ,other than providing the world nourishment, could that representative be Gods representation to man? The cow, would indeed be able to show us, that it can nourish others thru its generosity . And we can even say , the expression , "the milk of human kindness" can indeed have come from that, but more than that, I don't believe an ethical character can emerge.
Yesterday, the Pope went to the United Nations, and was greeted by its head, Banki Moon. Mr. Moon stressed to the body of the UN, that no religion was being promoted, in fact, he made very clear, that most, if not all the peoples represented at the UN were not representing any form of religion. Yet he also said, they did however represent a collective Faith.
A faith in what, I asked? On can only have Faith if one has a belief . And what can that belief be based upon if not some religion. Religion means, ones personal relationship to their God. If no God exists, upon what could you base this relationship?
One might conclude some form of ethical behavior would be the guide? But what are ethics based upon if not
a value system. And what if the values of one, isn't the values of another? How then can the east meet the west , so to speak.? Mr Moon stressed the differences in the UN, while the Pope asked that body, to reflect on their sameness.
He asked them to instead of regulating pages and pages of documents that outline their agendas, based upon a rule of laws dictated by the UN charters. To instead, go back to the main principles on which the UN was formed.
This body was formed to express, as well as actualize the inherent goodness of man. It was based upon the quote: Not to do to another, what you would not want done to you. Far too simple a principle I suppose for today's sophisticated societies. Yet it is the core of any person living in the body of Christ.
Why did Mr Moon see fit to distance himself from the Pope's beliefs? What harm would come to anyone, who chose to live the principles of the Christ? It is in the subtlety demonstrated by Banki Moon, that will keep people defining what is a terrorist for another thirty years. It is in the preoccupation of definition, that needs to speak with no hint of a God, that will never give the UN the Universality needed to crush the serpents head. Never giving them the Authority needed to place that Faith into something Greater than themselves. Instead they will spend decades in definitions, fear of offending, and God forbid, becoming the beacons of moral or ethical conviction.
They instead would prefer to leave that to the unintelligent God believers. Choosing to make certain, the distance they believe is required to keep their egos intact.
What the Pope asked of them was to go back to their human roots. To look to defining their words based upon what every person walking the earth would call it. What indeed is a terrorist? Is he not someone who threatens the peace and security of another's soul, by inflicting his need to cause fear in the other? Would any of us not know that meaning? Would we not know, as the Pope suggested, Augustine's edict , not to treat others , different than you yourself would want to be treated?
The Christ Consciousness, defines what is the best in humanity, yet so many in human form, fear to become that? They instead prefer to be seen in the eyes of the world, elite, educated , refined. They would prefer to distance themselves , so that they may remain in their ivory tower of word declinations rather than get their hands dirty,with the business of the soul.
Why is it , that becoming the living Christ makes people more self conscious then conscious of Self?
Why do we need people believe more in casting spells, then creating the consciousness of Christ?
Why do people need to worship an animal more than creating a union with the Man God?
I suppose mans individual ego, once it separated from its source, found both its journey and its weaknesses.
It also , I believe, for its survival, needs to deny the very part of itself that gave it life. This will always be mans choice. To do the will of God, or to deny it. To keep the distance of its separation, so that it can be pure EGO, or submit itself to something Greater than itself.
It is unfortunate that man in today's world of Caffe Latte, BMW's and living the Good Life, doesn't see, that the Good life can only truly be Lived, if it is Lived with God the Christ Conscious of our Divine Being.
Tags:
christ, ego, god, humility, soul, un
Posted at: 06:28 AM | Add Comment
